Durham University Library Cosin MS V.ii.9Quaestiones disputatae
Held by: Durham University Library: Cosin Manuscripts

Manuscript codex gathering 5 sets of theological quaestiones (identified as parts (A)-(E)) written in the mid 13th to early 14th century. The manuscript is identifiable from their late 14th century catalogue as one given to St Augustine's Priory, Canterbury by John Mankawel (died around 1330). The early attribution to Robert Kilwardby, f.1r, cannot refer to the Quaestiones in the earlier sections (A)-(B) but may relate to material in (C)-(E). Owned by George Davenport and given by him to Bishop Cosin's Library around 1670.


Physical description of manuscript
Support

Parchment, some flaws and natural edges; hair and flesh clearly distinguished; quires with flesh-side outermost), outer edge cropped (leading to loss of prickings and part of marginal note f.118v).

Extent: iii+157+i f
Size: 285 mm x 200 mm

Foliation

foliated, 1-159; 14th/15th century foliation in ink of f.3-157 as 1-158, omitting 111 and 113 and repeating 138.


Secundo folio: pa nichil
Collation

(A): f.3-46 - 112, 28, 3-412, (one quire or more lacking after f.46). (B): f.47-63) 512, 64 + one leaf (f.63) after 4. (C): f.64-111 - 7-1012; (D): f.112-123 1112. (E): f.124-156) 12-1412, (one quire or more lacking after f.159).

Catchwords: Catchwords in ink on quires 1-4, 7-8, and 12-14, or in soft brown on quire 9.
Layout

Prickings in outer margins only, frequently cropped away. Five sections intended to accompany each other, all ruled in brown lead, 2 columns:
(A) Written space 200 x 141-146 mm, 50 lines
(B) Written space 195-205 x 142 5 mm, 48-53 lines
(C) Written space 202 x 143 mm, 48-50 lines
(D) Written space 214 x 141-145 mm, 53 lines
(E) Written space 200-202 x 137-140 mm, 50 lines, with a pair of horizontal lines above and below written space, the latter not infrequently at an angle and repeated straight.

Script

Contents-list on f.2r in small 14th/15th centuryanglicana, badly faded. (A)-(B) Written in small gothic minuscule, unevenly, by one hand
(C) Written in (i) incipient anglicana f.64r-65v, (ii) f.66r-93r penultimate word, cursive gothic minuscule, leftwards-leaning, (iii) anglicana f.93r last word (where the marginal numbering ceases)-111v; for (i) and (iii), cf. Thomson, plates 94 (1282), and 95 (1291), also Watson, plates 131 (1286/1290 x 1296), 137 (1291, the same book as Thomson plate 95), which are apparently all of English origin
(D) Written in incipient anglicana, by one (?) somewhat variable hand f.112r-123r
(E) Written in a small square gothic minuscule of university type, somewhat clumsily. Possibly by “H de messingham”: the name is written in what appears to be the text hand f.133r lower outer corner, too early to be the early 15th century fellow of Merton College, Oxford, Nicholas de Messingham. A brother Johannes de Massingham is also recorded later at Canterbury in 1375.

Decoration

Not executed: spaces for initials to quaestiones: (A) 2 or (f.3r) 3 line; (B) 1 line or none; (C) 4 line (f.65v) or (f.64r) 5 line; (D) none; (E) 2 line. Indicators for paraphs (//) not generally implemented, but some in original black/brown ink, with marginal elaborations on f.93v-111r.

Corrections and annotation

Original side notes in (A)-(D), indicating and numbering arguments, with vestiges of an alphabetic indexing system in (C), and titles of some quaestiones in lower margins by a thin early corrector's hand in (A)-(D). Some supplies of missing matter in (C) show that an exemplar was available for checking by the original copyists and an early annotator. Corrections and annotations by more than one contemporaneous hand, in ink and soft grey/brown, largely in the early part of (A); markings include a profile of a human face, with tonsure, e.g. f.84v, or distinctive hand pointers, e.g. f.85, 88. “Hic” added at the beginning of item (B2) in soft brown in the margin, followed by “Questio” against item (B3), 3-6 against items (B4)-(B7) and “non plus” at the end item (B7), are perhaps directions to a subsequent copyist.

Binding

Rust marks from two fastenings on outer edge of f.1. Rebound in mid 19th century by Tuckett with new boards re-using 15th/16th century tooled leather on which are a lozenge stamp with the initials PI, and a large rose in a circle, which have been attributed by Graham Pollard to Peter Ingram of Canterbury, c. 1510. The lozenge occurs on two other manuscripts, Oxford Bodleian MSS Bodley 391, from St Augustine's Canterbury, and Arch.Seld.B.14 (Chaucer), the latter illustrated in Boyd, plate iii. Spine and outer endleaves replaced by Tuckett (retaining two medieval flyleaves as f.1-2), two clasps; spine-title "Theologia scholastica", from Davenport's on f.2r.


Manuscript history
Creation

Written in England or France, mid 13th - start of 14th century, (C)-(E) slightly later than (A)-(B).

Provenance

From St Augustine's Abbey, Canterbury, where it is catalogued (Dublin, Trinity College, MS 360, f.49r as "Questiones de verbo Roberti de kylwarbi et Johannis Mankawel 2o fp pa nichil D 7a ga 3o" (Barker-Benfield, volume I, p.735, no. 616).
After contents-list on f.1r, “precij v s.”, 13th/14th century.
Inscription: “Johannis Mankael”, f.1r, 14th century, below the press mark, “Distinctio vii Gradus III”, of St Augustine's Abbey, Canterbury, refers to the donor of this and 38 other volumes, several of which survive. The manuscript's contents probably all pre-date him, for he became D.D. c. 1325-9 and died in 1334, see BRUO, 1214-15. See also Emden 1968, p.12-13; Barker-Benfield, volume III, 1844-45 (questioning year of death).
Title: “Questiones diuerse super sententias”, at head of lower cover, in ink, 15th/16th century. Inscription: “JBaxter 1570”, f.3r, perhaps the rector of St Mary the Less, Durham (died 1572). “Samuell Bushe”, f.159v upside down, 16th/17th century. “Geo.Davenport. 1664.” f.1v; ex-libris and shelf-mark by Thomas Rud f.3r.


SECTION:
Manuscript contents
(flyleaves)    
f.1r
Language: Latin

In hoc libro continentur ista | [one line erased and illegible] | questiones determinate de verbo multe et bone | questiones multe Fratris Roberti de kiliewardby | with a further erased illegible line bracketed to the right of the foregoing lines, written late 13th century. Kilwardby is not styled archbishop of Canterbury, which he became in 1272.

f.2r-2v
Language: Latin

Contents list. [1] Vtrum verbum in diuinis dicatur essentialiter aut tantum personaliter Primo fo[lio] ... ... (88) Vtrum anima rationalis sit mortalis fo[lio] 155. List of articles of (A)-(E), with a numbering in fives added by Thomas Rud. The numbering of the items below follows that in the margin of each by the original hand and the later list above, despite its omission of five articles (B1), (D4), (E10), (E11), (E24). Added in two columns, 14th/15th century anglicana hand.


SECTION:
Manuscript contents
(A)     f.3r-46v

Quaestiones: fourteen articles, the last breaking off imperfectly, on topics of Peter Lombard, Sententiae books 1 and 3, citing chiefly Anselm and Augustine, also Hugh of St Victor; nos 3, 8 14 numbered in the margins by the copyist.

(A1)     f.3r
Incipit: [Q]ueritur de uerbo in diuinis. et subposito quod uerbum ueraciter dicatur esse in diuinis. quero utrum ibi dicatur eesnetialiter an tantum personaliter
Explicit: uel cuiuscumque alterius a se intellecti.
Language: Latin
(A2)     f.6r
Incipit: [Q]uestio est vtrum in diuinis dicatur uerbum proprie uel non
Explicit: ut plenius patet in responsione ad [space]
Language: Latin
(A3)     f.9v
Incipit: [Q]uestio est vtrum in diuinis sit tantum vnum uerbum personaliter dictum an plura
Explicit: si ex impossibili sequatur impossibile.
Language: Latin
(A4)     f.13r
Incipit: [Q]uestio de uerbo in se queritur de uerbo in comparacione ad carnem. et primo vtrum incarnacio sit possibilis
Explicit: fieri si deus uellet.
Language: Latin
(A5)     f.17r
Incipit: [S]ubposito quod incarnacio sit possibilis. queritur utrum sit necessaria
Explicit: eo tibi apponitur.
Language: Latin
(A6)     f.21r
Incipit: [C]onceditur quare de incarnacione ex parte assumpti. et primo vtrum concedi debeat quod filius dei assumpsit humanam personam an non sed tantum naturam
Explicit: dignitatem confert. ut dictum est.
Language: Latin
(A7)     f.24r
Incipit: [Q]ueritur vtrum Christus assumpsit in diuiduum
Explicit: argumentum ad partem oppositam.
Language: Latin
(A8)     f.25v
Incipit: [H]abito quid assumpsit. queritur quale fuit id quod assumpsit precipue quo ad carnem. vtrum scilicet assumpsit carnem talem qualem habuit Adam ante peccatum an non
Explicit: quo ad easdem condiciones.
Language: Latin
(A9)     f.27v
Incipit: [H]abito qualem carnem Christus assumpsit: restat querere qualis fuit uirgo de qua assumpsit
Explicit: sine peccato natus ut predictum est.
Language: Latin
(A10)     f.31r
Incipit: [S]upposito quod beata uirgo non fuerit sanctificata in conceptione sed post. queritur vtrum fuerit sanctificata in utero
Explicit: nullatenus essent priuilegiate.
Language: Latin
(A11)     f.35r
Incipit: [H]abito de sanctificacione beata marie in utero: queritur de efficacia gratie collate in sanctificacione. et quero vtrum illa gratia fuerit tante efficacie ut per eam omnem culpam actuale cauere potuerit
Explicit: ex proxima ratione precedente.
Language: Latin
(A12)     f.39r
Incipit: [D]e secunda sanctificacione beate uirginis queritur sanctificata est in concepcione filii dei; queritur quo ad efficaciam primo utrum in illa sanctificacione fuerit fomes peccati omnino extinctus an solum modo consopitus siue debilitatus
Explicit: pro genere humano satisfaccionem.
Language: Latin
(A13)     f.43r
Incipit: [H]abito de efficacia secunde sanctificacionis que facta fuit in conceptu filii dei quo ad extinccionem fomitis; his queritur de efficacia quo ad effectum confirmacionis
Explicit: peccatum esse non potuit.
Language: Latin
(A14)     f.45r
Incipit: [H]abito de temporali Christi generacione; queritur de cor[r]espondente sibi filiacione. vtrum scilicet sit anima a filiacione que respondet generacioni eterne
Explicit: nisi in vna persona [catchwords f.46v] ...
Language: Latin

SECTION:
Manuscript contents
(B)     f.47r-63v

Quaestiones: sixteen articles, on topics of Peter Lombard, Sententiae books 1-2, mostly much less fully elaborated than in (A). Nos 15-20 numbered 1-6 in soft brown in margins.

(B1)     f.47r
Incipit: [Q]uestio est de qualitate personarum in trinitate summa. et videtur quod in personis diuinis sit aliqua inequalitas sic
Explicit: de tuo cognosce tu et tui. etc.
Language: Latin
(B2)     f.48r
Incipit: [Q]ueritur de lege eterna an sit deus quod sic
Explicit: in veritate sue ydee ad quam reducitur ¶ De .s.tus. cogita.
Language: Latin
(B3)     f.49r
Incipit: [C]onsequenter queritur de unitate legis eterne
Explicit: promota consummatione lex.
Language: Latin
(B4)     f.49v
Incipit: [C]onsequenter vtrum eterna sit legit ab abuersariis legis
Explicit: per hoc patet responsio ad idem sap' 2.
Language: Latin
(B5)     f.50r
Incipit: [C]onsequenter queritur vbi uideat ipsius legem eternam. vtrum scilicet in se
Explicit: quales sunt potentie quantum ad omnia sicut docet Augustinus [De] trinitate 15.c.
Language: Latin
(B6)     f.50v
Incipit: Qveritur per quid uideat impius legem eternam. vtrum scilicet illustrentur per lumen creatum uel increatum
Explicit: ad exercendum se in opus suum.
Language: Latin
(B7)     f.50v
Incipit: [P]ostquam quesitum est de lege eterna consequens est inquirare de legibus diuinatis ab ista et primo de lege naturali et primo quid sit in se et absolute
Explicit: lex uero naturalis dicit obiectum vtriusque.
Language: Latin
(B8)     f.51v
Incipit: [Q]uesitum est de iustificacione impii et cum 4 exigantur ad iustificacionem. videlicet motus liberi arbitri
Explicit: terminus transmutacionis non transmutacio.
Language: Latin
(B9)     f.52v
Incipit: [C]onsequenter queritur de ordine nature in predicta 4 et videtur quod remissio culpe precedat per infusionem gratie
Explicit: informatus caritate et sic patet quod non precedit et sic patet ad omnia.
Language: Latin
(B10)     f.54r
Incipit: [C]onsequenter quesitum an dolor contriccionis sit maximus quod non videtur primo per diffinicionem
Explicit: de dolore spirituale et contriccione.
Language: Latin
(B11)     f.55r
Incipit: [C]onsequenter quesitum est de efficacia contriccionis utrum deleat culpam
Explicit: directe dimissioni culpe respondet.
Language: Latin
(B12)     f.56r
Incipit: [Q]ueritur de veritate [? for virtute] primo in generali secundo de uirtutibus in speciali scilicet theologicis et cardinalibus
Explicit: gratia sit deus.
Language: Latin
(B13)     f.58r
Incipit: Habito quid sit uirtus et quod sit aliud adeo sequitur videre quid sit virtus vtrum substancia uel accidens
Explicit: virtus sed ipsius similitudo.
Language: Latin
(B14)     f.61r
Incipit: Consequenter queritur in quo sit virtus ut in subiecto vtrum scilicet in essencia anime uel in potencia
Explicit: ab anima per potencias.
Language: Latin
(B15)     f.61v
Incipit: Consequenter queritur de virtute utrum sit vnum uel vnum specie
Explicit: pronior est ad malum quam ad bonum.
Language: Latin
(B16)     f.63r
Incipit: Dicto de virtute in generali et hec in se sequitur de virtute in comparacione et primo ad gratiam
Explicit: ipsa sit forma simplex
Language: Latin

No final stop so possibly incomplete


SECTION:
Manuscript contents
(C)     f.64r-111v

Quaestiones: twenty-two articles, on (?) theological topics of Peter Lombard's Sententiae books 1-2, frequently citing Augustine, also philosophical, e.g. Alpharabius, De intellectu (f.95v, 103v). The text runs on, without indented initials or line breaks, but with questions 2-4, 8-9 and 13 numbered in the margin; otherwise fresh articles being identifiable only from inconspicuous side notes, some underlining, and the later contents table, f.2r. The article numbered “13”, f.88r, is in fact the twelfth; this may be because the start of article [11] was omitted as part of the deficit noted on f.84v, but the purported omission is doubtful, for there is no clear break in the argument at the point indicated. f.111v final line of col. b left blank.

(C1)     f.64r
Incipit: [E]uanuerunt in cogitacionibus suis et obscurata est etc. Ro.i.[21] glosa. tumore superbie obumbrante. cor.i. rationem eorum. ¶occasione huius quesitum est an superbia excecet quod non videtur sic
Explicit: deus auctor illius.
Language: Latin
(C2)     f.66v
Incipit: Sequitur an venialia peccata excecent uel obscurunt intellectum quod sic
Explicit: capax est illuminacionis passione sumpte et intellectum obscuratur.
Language: Latin
(C3)     f.67v
Incipit: Sequitur an necesse sit animam illuminari a ueritate increata
Explicit: concludi potest aliquid pertinens ad rem.
Language: Latin
(C4)     f.70r
Incipit: Sequitur an solus deus doceat secundum quod dicitur Mt 23[:8] vnus est ma[gister] uester Christus
Explicit: uoluntate latronis//
Language: Latin
(C5)     f.72v
Incipit: De uisione intellectuali queritur quid subiaceat huic visioni et primo an intellectus aptus sit ad cognoscendum
Explicit: potenciis inferioribus//
Language: Latin
(C6)     f.75r
Incipit: Sequitur an uirtutes se ipsis videantur ab intellectu sicut videtur velle Augustinus super Genesim
Explicit: ideo patet quod non procedit obieccio.
Language: Latin
(C7)     f.77v
Incipit: Sequitur de mente an semper nouerit se quod sicut videtur omne cognoscens
Explicit: manifestius apparet. Nota de hoc A[ugustinus] libro 14 de tri[nitate] c. 10. 12. 12. 13. 18. et libro 15 c.63. 64//
Language: Latin
(C8)     f.79r
Incipit: Sequitur an deus uisibilis sit uisione intellectuali
Explicit: ut prehabitum est.
Language: Latin
(C9)     f.80v
Incipit: Sequitur an sola naturalia sufficiant anime ut visione intellectuali videat deum in se siue per speciem quod non uidetur
Explicit: videt faciem suam.
Language: Latin
(C10)     f.83v
Incipit: Quia videtur A[ugustinus] uelle 6 musice c. 8 quod sensibile in mittendo (?) speciem suam non agat nisi in organum corporum et non in ipsam animam
Explicit: in excelsum crebri locum tanquam in celum corporis nostri vnde et radii emicant oculorum etc.
Language: Latin

f.84v marginal note with cross in text, by early 14th century corrector: “+ hic deficit folium et plus”

(C11)     f.86r
Incipit: Sequitur vtrum species uel ymagines sensibilium transseant a sensu in spiritum siue in memoriam uel ibi fiant a spiritu
Explicit: in speculo animo. etc.//
Language: Latin
(C12)     f.88r
Incipit: Ad manifestem cuiusdam suppositi scilicet quod spiritus fantasmatus siue ymaginatiua adquirat sibi rerum ymagines et non habet eas sibi inditas
Explicit: antequam interrogaretur uel doceret//
Language: Latin
(C13)     f.88v
Incipit: An spiritus faciat in se et de se ymagines corporum
Explicit: et sic et formatum format organum//
Language: Latin
(C14)     f.90v
Incipit: /a Item queritur vtrum ymagines in spiritu sicut substantie uel accidencia
Explicit: sensitiua non percipiat.
Language: Latin
(C15)     f.91r
Incipit: Sequitur de uisione intellectuali an scilicet quo intellectus cognoscit sit species siue intencio uniuersalis (?) uel indiuidualis
Explicit: et generatio non esset id ipsum.
Language: Latin
(C16)     f.92r
Incipit: Sequitur de eo quod est intellectiua anima. An cognoscitur per aliquid indiuiduale
Explicit: cognosci per speciem vniuersalis tantum.
Language: Latin
(C17)     f.92v
Incipit: Item quod intellectus cognoscat id quod sub se est cognoscat scilicet particulare sensibile per intencionem indiuidualem
Explicit: particulare sensibile sicut supra habitum est.
Language: Latin
(C18)     f.94r
Incipit: Sequitur an intellectus possibilis sit vnus re uel numero in omnibus hominibus
Explicit: adueniunt vnicuique indiuiduo ut patebit prima.
Language: Latin
(C19)     f.98r
Incipit: De intellectu etiam possibili queritur an sit aptus intelligere intellectum agentem et formas abstractas per naturam
Explicit: de substancia dei sed de nichilo.
Language: Latin
(C20)     f.102r
Incipit: Sequitur an id quo intellectus possibilis intelligit sic idem apud omnes
Explicit: secundum substanciam quod aer.
Language: Latin
(C21)     f.108v
Incipit: Sequitur de intuitione actu intellecta quid sit re. an sit in substancia uel accidens uel nec substancia uel nec accidens
Explicit: fuit in potencia receptiua.
Language: Latin
(C22)     f.110r
Incipit: Sequitur de intellectu possibiili qualiter cognoscit animam sensitiuam uel uegetatiuam
Explicit: specialis ratione pretacta.
Language: Latin

SECTION:
Manuscript contents
(D)     f.112r-123r

Quaestiones: nine articles; and, (D10), an expository passage. f.123v blank, unruled.

(D1)     f.112r
Incipit: Sequitur per quid possit cognosci et ostendi potencias anime differre ab inuicem non numero tantum
Explicit: in questione que est de hoc.
Language: Latin
(D2)     f.114r
Incipit: De consciencia queritur an sit substancia mentis
Explicit: elicitum a potencia affectiua.
Language: Latin
(D3)     f.115v
Incipit: Habito quod consciencia non sit substancia anime sed accidens sequitur an sit accidens innatum uel adquisitum aut infusum
Explicit: in potencia essentiali;
Language: Latin
(D4)     f.117r
Incipit: Sequitur de obiecto consciencie proprio quid sit
Explicit: secundum quod tale.
Language: Latin
(D5)     f.118r
Incipit: Sequitur questio de actu consciencie intellectus speculatiuus per extencionem ad opus fit paraclitus
Explicit: actus est proprius ut patet in proposicio.
Language: Latin
(D6)     f.119r
Incipit: Sequitur questio an consciencia sit lex. si sit lex an sit lex intellectus
Explicit: sic non est lex. ¶ Super Respondende ad 3m.
Language: Latin
(D7)     f.119v
Incipit: Sequitur questio vtrum conscientia sit lex intellectus uel affectus
Explicit: ultima et propinqua.
Language: Latin
(D8)     f.120v
Incipit: Sequitur questio vtrum consciencia sit in ratione superiore uel inferiore uel in utrum
Explicit: enim docet et dicando dirigit.
Language: Latin
(D9)     f.122r
Incipit: Sequitur questio de habicudine consciencie ad uirtutes
Explicit: uirtutes secundo et deliberatiue.
Language: Latin
(D10)     f.122v
Incipit: Quia pluries facta est mencio de lege intellectus uel mentis et de lege naturali et de lege consciencie
Explicit: tunc lex conscientie aut dicitur intransitiue aut transitiue. primo modo lex secunda predictarum.
Language: Latin

SECTION:
Manuscript contents
(E)     f.124r-156v

Quaestiones: thirty articles, the last imperfect, with the opening only of another (E24), at which point the subject matter changes. Avicenna, De vi informativa, cited f.148rb; “augustinus ... in libro suo de anima” in the text is corrected marginally by a contemporary hand to “auicenna”, f.145r. Spaces left in the text at a number of points suggest that the copyist had difficulty with the exemplar. Items (E4)-(E8) numbered in the margin by the main hand, 10-11 and 13-15.

(E1)     f.124r
Incipit: questio est de sinderesi de qua dicitur Eze.i.[5] et ex medio eius similitudo quatuor animalium ibi glosa Jeronimus plerique
Explicit: possit dici potencia.
Language: Latin
(E2)     f.124v
Incipit: [S]upposito quod sinderesis sit habitus alicuius potencie anime rationalis. sequitur questio utrum potencie cognitiue uel motiue
Explicit: de aliis accionibus intellige.
Language: Latin
(E3)     f.126v
Incipit: [C]onsequenter queritur utrum sinderesis habitus partim adquiritur sicut conscientia an totaliter
Explicit: ex errore consciencie dictantis quandoque errat. st iam est questio de consciencia que est rationis naturalis ... et cum non obedit reprehendit.
Language: Latin
(E4)     f.127r
Incipit: [S]equitur utrum sinderesis peccet cum errat et uidetur quod sic
Explicit: que continet sinderesim.
Language: Latin
(E5)     f.128r
Incipit: [S]equitur utrum sinderesis regulet conscienciam uel reguletur ab ea
Explicit: comparatur scintille a Ieronimo.
Language: Latin
(E6)     f.128v
Incipit: [S]equitur an sinderesis quo ad habitum uel actum in uita ista possit extingui
Explicit: sed ei non obedit liberum arbitrium.
Language: Latin
(E7)     f.129v
Incipit: [S]equitur utrum sinderesis in dampnatur [for dampnatis] priuetur omni usu rationis
Explicit: pro statu iam eleccionum et post.
Language: Latin
(E8)     f.130v
Incipit: [S]et quia hic et supra suppositum est quod in dampnatis est aliqua noticia ueritatis ideo queritur an hoc sit verum
Explicit: quod sensualitas subdenda est rationi.
Language: Latin
(E9)     f.131r
Incipit: [S]equitur de sensualitate utrum sit aliquid anime sensitiue tantum uel sit etiam anime rationalis
Explicit: quod sit potencie anime sensitiue rationalis.
Language: Latin
(E10)     f.132r
Incipit: Supposito quod sensualitas sit potencia anime sensitiue queritur an sit potencia cognitiua uel appetitiua
Explicit: quod est appetitus rerum ad corpus pertinencium.
Language: Latin
(E11)     f.132v
Incipit: [C]onsequenter queritur utrum peccatum sit in sensualitate
Explicit: H[ugo de S. Victore] De sacra. et aliis quibusdam uiris auctenticis.
Language: Latin
(E12)     f.133r
Incipit: Supposito quod peccatum ueniale non tantum casualiter immo essentialiter possit esse in sensualitate, queritur an sic similiter peccatum mortale
Explicit: contra spiritum siue rationem repugnantia.
Language: Latin
(E13)     f.133v
Incipit: [S]equitur de vi irascibili et concupiscibili utrum sint eadem potencia differens per actus uel officia tantum an diuerse potencie
Explicit: contra rationalem siue cognitiuam et que est potencia differens ab ea.
Language: Latin
(E14)     f.134v
Incipit: [S]equitur de obiecto uis irascibilis et concupiscibilis quid sit re
Explicit: sed quandoque rationi rebelles fiant.
Language: Latin
(E15)     f.135v
Incipit: [S]equitur de actu vis concupiscibilis qui est concupiscere qualis esset illud concupiscere est actus anime sensitiue
Explicit: conuenit alteri per se set non primo.
Language: Latin
(E16)     f.136r
Incipit: [S]equitur an possibile sit carnem concupiscere contra spiritum
Explicit: in potencie quam potencie ut prehabitum est.
Language: Latin
(E17)     f.136v
Incipit: [S]equitur de concupiscencia an dicat habitum uel priuacionem uel aliquid partim habens de habitu partim de priuacione
Explicit: habet deficientem vnde prima ibi falsa est.
Language: Latin
(E18)     f.137r
Incipit: [S]equitur an iste uires scilicet concupiscibilis et irascibilis sint in anima rationali
Explicit: obiecta alia ut puto concludit uerum.
Language: Latin
(E19)     f.137v
Incipit: [S]equitur de libero arbitrio et primo an sit quod sit probacio vniuersum perfectum est Deuter. 32[:4] dei perfecta sunt opera
Explicit: quod gratia compatitur secum liberum arbitrium probat Augustinus De concordia et c. 23. 24. 25. 26.
Language: Latin
(E20)     f.138v
Incipit: [S]equitur an liberum arbitrium sit in brutis
Explicit: delectatur libere facit primo modo non.
Language: Latin
(E21)     f.139v
Incipit: [S]equitur de libero arbitrio an sit in deo
Explicit: que cause ydeales in deo fuerint ab eterno.
Language: Latin
(E22)     f.140r
Incipit: [S]equitur an liberum arbitrium eque sit in omnibus deo scilicet et creaturis et an eque in omnibus creaturis
Explicit: ad uolendum eque conuenit omni libero arbitrio.
Language: Latin
(E23)     f.140v
Incipit: [S]equitur quorum est liberum arbitrium siue in eius acciones libere potest
Explicit: faciendum uel non faciendum secundum iudicium rationis.
Language: Latin
(E24)     f.141v
Incipit: [S]equitur de libero arbitrio. quid sit re. scilicet an substantia potencia uel habitus et etiam quid sit diffinitione et ista questio alibi scripta est. set hic inseratur.
Language: Latin

3 lines left blank; change of ink

(E25)     f.
Incipit: [S]equitur de intellectu possibili qualiter cognoscit se ipsum utrum scilicet se ipso uel per speciem
Explicit: quam forma materialis et intencio sua ut iam patet.
Language: Latin
(E26)     f.144r
Incipit: [S]equitur an sit memoria intellectiue sicut et sensitiue
Explicit: quod memoria corporalium est anime sensitiue non intellectiue.
Language: Latin
(E27)     f.147r
Incipit: [S]equitur questio de anima sensitiua et uegetatiua brutali
Explicit: anime sensitiue a conueniente aliquo modo ut patet ex predictis.
Language: Latin
(E28)     f.151r
Incipit: [S]equitur an educcio anime sensitiue brutalis uel uegetatiue fuerit successiua an subita
Explicit: contra mutacionem que fit sub subito ideo obiectio illa non procedit.
Language: Latin
(E29)     f.152v
Incipit: [S]equitur an sensitiua hominis educatur uel creetur
Explicit: nec esse actuale potest amittere. ideo sic factus est ut semper sit.
Language: Latin
(E30)     f.154v
Incipit: [S]equitur an anima rationalis creetur uel educatur de potencia ad actum
Explicit: difficile est intelligere uel etiam fingere ideo hoc omittatur.
Language: Latin
(E31)     f.156v
Incipit: [S]equitur questio an anima rationalis sit mortalis ut scilicet corrumpatur corrupto corpore
Explicit: anima enim quo ad suum
Language: Latin

Ending imperfectly with catchwords: superius con


Microfilm
Microfilmed in 1985/86 by the Hill Monastic Manuscript Library, St John's Abbey and University, Collegeville, Minnesota. Copies held by them and Durham University Library.

Bibliography

Barker-Benfield, B. C., St Augustine's Abbey, Canterbury, Corpus of British medieval library catalogues, 13 (London: British Library, 2008)

Boyd, B., Chaucer and the medieval book   OCLC citation, (San Marino CA.: Huntinigton Library, 1973)

BRUO: Emden, A. B., A biographical register of the University of Oxford to 1500   OCLC citation (Oxford: OUP, 1957-59)

Catalogi veteres librorum Ecclesiae cathedralis dunelm. Catalogues of the library of Durham cathedral, at various periods, from the conquest to the dissolution, including catalogues of the library of the abbey of Hulne, and of the mss.   OCLC citation, Surtees Society 7, (London: J.B. Nichols and Son, [1838]).

Emden, A. B., Donors of Books to St Augustine's, Canterbury   OCLC citation, (Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society, 1968)

Thomson, S. H., Latin bookhands of the later Middle Ages, 1100-1500 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969)

Watson, A. G., Catalogue of dated and datable manuscripts c. 435-1600 in Oxford libraries   OCLC citation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)

Index terms